News
Comments Off on Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: January 2023

Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: January 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: May 2023

China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: May 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: May 2023

Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: May 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: March 2023

China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: March 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: April 2023

China Feed and Livestock Dashboard: April 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: April 2023

Vietnam Feed and Livestock Dashboard: April 2023

Posted by | July 17, 2023 |

Comments Off on A healthy calf from Russia’s cloned cow

A healthy calf from Russia’s cloned cow

Posted by | February 21, 2023 |

https://www.dairyglobal.net/dairy/breeding/a-healthy-calf-from-russias-cloned-cow/
April 15, 2025

A group of scientists from the Russian Skoltech Institute cloned the cow in April 2020, altering genes in such a way as to remove proteins responsible for beta-lactoglobulin. Generic calf photo: Michel Zoeter.
A group of scientists from the Russian Skoltech Institute cloned the cow in April 2020, altering genes in such a way as to remove proteins responsible for beta-lactoglobulin. Generic calf photo: Michel Zoeter.

Russia’s first cloned cow gave birth to a healthy calf at the end of last year, marking a significant milestone for the development of gene editing technologies in the country’s livestock industry.

A group of scientists from the Russian Skoltech Institute cloned the cow in April 2020, altering genes in such a way as to remove proteins responsible for beta-lactoglobulin. The researchers used CRISPR/Cas9 technology, cloning the cow using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). The target was to create a cow to produce milk fit for consumers with lactose intolerance.

Studying reproduction system

The scientists explained that the gene-editing technology could have a broad application, as changing the genome could help boost yields or make animals more prone to heat stress. Still, confirming that the cow could have healthy offspring was essential.

“Genome-editing technology can only be developed when cloned animals are capable of giving birth to viable offspring. That is why the birth of the first calf by a cloned cow is a great achievement for Moscow-region scientists. The animals are well and are under round-the-clock supervision by veterinarians,” the press service quoted Georgy Filimonov, deputy prime minister of the Moscow region in charge of the agriculture and food ministry, as saying.

“Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) with the use of genetically modified somatic cells is seen today as a key technological platform for genome editing of cattle and other livestock. That is why specialists are conducting research to improve the critically important stages of the technological chain,” the ministry said.

Improved animals

Petr Sergiev, a professor at Skoltech Institute and one of the study’s authors, said that after the cloned cow gives birth to offspring, the scientists planned to proceed to the next stage: inseminating a herd of several dozen cows with embryos with the edited genes.

Sergiev also said that “genomic editing methods and reproductive technologies will soon lead to the creation of farm animals with improved properties. This technology should help create animals with improved characteristics, such as disease resistance.”

The scientists said they created a new breed of cows. However, it will be years before it can be available to Russian farmers, they added. Currently, no legislation regulates the sales of products from animals with altered genes in Russia. On the other hand, the country has a strict law regulating the turnover of food with genetically modified organisms.

Comments Off on Avian influenza reported in Argentina and Uruguay

Avian influenza reported in Argentina and Uruguay

Posted by | February 21, 2023 |

https://www.poultryworld.net/health-nutrition/health/avian-influenza-reported-in-argentina-and-uruguay/
April 15, 2025

In Uruguay, avian influenza was identified in a black-necked swan in the country's south coast. Photo: Steffen Wachsmuth
In Uruguay, avian influenza was identified in a black-necked swan in the country’s south coast. Photo: Steffen Wachsmuth

Argentina and Uruguay confirmed their first cases of avian influenza amongst wild birds on 15 February, reinforcing that the disease is advancing in South America.

In Argentina, bird flu was identified in Andean geese in the Jujuy province. Photo: Colorado State University Libraries
In Argentina, bird flu was identified in Andean geese in the Jujuy province. Photo: Colorado State University Libraries

All countries in South America have confirmed cases of avian influenza, with the exception of Brazil, Guyana and Suriname. However, the proximity of productive regions in Brazil and the absence of major geographic barriers further increase probabilities of the virus reaching the largest chicken exporter in the world.

In the Uruguayan case, the virus was identified in a black-necked swan near Lagoa Garzón in the south coast of the country. In Argentina, the disease was identified in the province of Jujuy in Andean geese.

According to Uruguay’s El Observador newspaper, authorities from the Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries are assessing the situation and appropriate measures will be taken.

An emergency meeting

Meanwhile, Argentina’s secretary of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Juan José Bahillo, called an emergency meeting on the matter.

“The presence of the virus in Argentina puts all our services on alert, but it does not surprise us. We have already been working with different prevention organisations and territorial coverage to control the problem,” said the secretary.

According to him, the most common way of entry is through migratory birds, which is difficult to control. “Bird migrations brought the disease-causing virus from the northern hemisphere,” he adds.

Bird flu has wiped out millions of birds in Europe, North America and Asia in the months before its arrival in South America.

Brazil is on alert

In Brazil, after confirmation in neighbouring countries, the Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (ABPA) issued a note in which it states that “it is monitoring the actions”.

The disease is devastating for birds and, according to a survey, could cause €2.4 billion in damage to the Brazilian poultry sector.

The Brazilian entity said it was in direct contact with the Asociación de Productores Avícolas Sur, the regional poultry representative, along with members of other organisations in Latin America.

The objective is, together with the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, to monitor the situation.

Brazil remains free of avian influenza

In the note, ABPA reinforces the importance for Brazil – which remains free of avian influenza – of keeping biosecurity protocols, especially in the protection of its commercial herds.

“It is worth remembering that the situation registered in Uruguay (with wild birds) is an example of a case that would not suspend trade and exports of poultry products, in accordance with recommendations established by the World Organisation for Animal Health,” says the text.

Comments Off on Understanding the pathways of antibiotic resistance genes

Understanding the pathways of antibiotic resistance genes

Posted by | February 21, 2023 |

https://www.pigprogress.net/health-nutrition/health/understanding-the-pathways-of-args/
April 15, 2025

ARGs

In swine farming, antibiotics are mainly used for prophylactic and growth promotion purposes. Photo: Hans Prinsen fotografie Hans Prinsen

Swine farming is a fundamental source of environmental antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) worldwide. Understanding the pathways of ARG propagation into the environment is critical to develop strategies to mitigate environmental and public health impacts of antibiotic resistance.

Infections that are resistant against antibiotics are a universal concern. They cost up to $ 100 trillion per year in health care and global mortality will reach 10 million animals by 2050.

Gut microbiota acquire and maintain ARGs

In swine farming, antibiotics are mainly used for prophylactic and growth promotion purposes. They are consistently detected in pigs’ guts at low and sub-lethal concentrations. As a result, gut microbiota acquire and maintain ARGs and enhance the abundance of resistant bacteria.

The excretion of ARGs into the soil and water is an emerging environmental, human health, and operational concern which limits the number of effective antibiotics for therapeutic purposes.

Swine waste has a greater diversity and a higher abundance of ARGs compared to other livestock waste

Antibiotic resistance mechanisms

Major resistance mechanisms include antibiotic deactivation, extrusion through efflux pumps, and protection of targets by specific proteins. The ARGs confer resistance to several major classes of antibiotics including tetracyclines, sulfonamides, β-lactams, macrolide-lincosamidstreptogramin B, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and amphenicol.

Diversity and abundance of ARGs

Swine waste has a greater diversity and a higher abundance of ARGs compared to other livestock waste. This is due to a more intensive use of antibiotics for therapeutic, prophylactic, and metaphylactic purposes. Pigs also receive higher dosages early in life.

In addition, the abundance of ARGs in pig waste varies among countries, with China being at the top of the list as the largest producer and consumer of antibiotics. Site-specific physical and chemical conditions within countries affect the abundance of ARGs propagation and attenuation dynamics, as well.

ARGs spread from pigs to humans

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ARGs transferr from pigs into the soil through land application of manure and waste water irrigation. They spread to aquatic environments through waste water discharge and runoff. Intracellular and free ARGs in the soil and ground water transfer to indigenous bacteria through horizontal gene transfer. Then, antibiotic-resistant bacteria reach and colonise in humans causing acute or chronic infections.

Propagation of ARGs in a new environment depends on the survival, proliferation, maintenance, replication, and gene transfer by the original host and the probability of gene acquisition by new hosts. The growth rates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, substrate concentrations, and the presence of toxic compounds impact the occurence of ARGs in the environment.

Oral ingestion of contaminated food, waste, residual waste from occupational exposure or contaminated environments and inhalation are the pathways by which antibiotic-resistant bacteria reach human gut environments. Factors such as high concentrations and proximity of ARG donors and recipients, temperature, physiochemical conditions, and nutrient availability increase horizontal gene transfer in the human gut and cause multidrug resistance genes occurrence.

ARGs can be removed from manure by conventional waste treatment

Standard manure treatment

ARGs can be removed from manure by conventional waste treatment. The waste is stored in lagoons and then treated through anaerobic digestion or composting and it is separated into solid and liquid streams. The solids are used to fertilise agriculture soils, and the liquid is treated in a bioreactor or is discharged directly to waterbodies without treatment.

Differences in operating temperature, abilities of potential hosts to maintain and transfer ARGs, and properties of the manure affect the abundance of certain types of ARGs. Strategies including manure stabilisation with lime before application, vegetating the soil with appropriate plants, and using land application methods such as incorporation or injection mitigate ARG propagation in the soil.

Supplementing biochar and wheat straw reduces the dissolved concentration of inhibitory residual antibiotics and heavy metals, improves the digestion process and the associated removal of ARGs. Furthermore, thermophilic composting along with additives that reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals is effective in reducing the diversity and abundance of ARGs in manure.

Controlling ARG levels at the source

Strategies including adjusting animal diets to minimise disease occurrence, decreasing human-to-animal contact, optimising waste collection methods, increasing the frequency of waste collection, and creating containment areas for sick animals reduce the spread of disease, and the ARG abundance and diversity at the source.

In addition, halting antibiotic use, preventing conjugation of plasmids carrying ARGs, and promoting resistance plasmid loss decrease the ARG abundance. Using antibiotic alternatives such as antimicrobial peptides, probiotics, and prebiotics is a promising method for selective microbial control. Regulations and policy for manure storage and disposal practices should be established to reduce ARGs discharge into receiving environments. In addition, disinfection processes such as chlorination and UV disinfection remove ARGs from drinking water and municipal wastewater.

Further research

Further research is needed to develop validated models to quantitatively assess the impact of ARG dissemination from pigs on human health.

 

Comments Off on Impact of initial gut microbiota colonisation on piglet performance

Impact of initial gut microbiota colonisation on piglet performance

Posted by | February 17, 2023 |

https://www.pigprogress.net/health-nutrition/health/impact-of-initial-gut-microbiota-colonisation-on-performance/
April 15, 2025

gut microbiota
Research shows that the initial colonisation of gut microbiota in piglets occurs at least within the immediate prenatal period. Photo: Henk Riswick

Piglets encounter various events affecting the development of their gut microbiota. It is essential to identify when and how to establish and maintain the optimum piglet gut microbiota to have the best production outcomes.

What are gut microbiota?

Gut microbiota is a collection of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses associated with an essential role in many body processes. Gut microbiota impact performance and manipulate improvements in feed efficiency and average daily gain. Early-life microbial colonisation is the most important time for shaping gut microbiota.

The sow’s microbiota and the rearing environment influence the piglet’s gut microbiota functionality and composition

Initial microbial colonisation

Research shows that the initial colonisation of gut microbiota in piglets occurs at least within the immediate prenatal period. The sow’s microbiota and the rearing environment influence the piglet’s gut microbiota functionality and composition. They also influence its immune system development, growth, and survival.

Piglet exposure to the sow vagina, its pen environment, and the sow’s antibiotic exposure, dietary treatments, the length of time between sow microbiota modulation and piglet exposure cause some differences between the sow’s microbiota and that of her her progeny.

Oxidative stress affects sow gut microbiota

During late gestation and early lactation, the sows’ metabolic demands increase. This leads to oxidative stress, which impairs energy balance, body condition, and milk production. It also causes negative outcomes for sows and piglets.

In addition, it affects their offspring’s gut microbiota. For instance, the abundance of Bacteroidaceae is associated with higher antioxidant capacity and better litter performance, while the presence of Phascolarctobacterium, Cyanobacteria and Streptococcus are linked with lower piglet performance and higher oxidative stress in sows.

Furthermore, the abundance of Lachnospiraceae, Marvinbryantia and Ruminococcaceae is higher in sows with an increased stillbirth rate and reduced antioxidant capacity. There also is an increase in the abundance of short-chain fatty acid producing and fiber-degrading bacteria such as Ruminococcus, Fibrobacter and Butyricicoccus, and higher concentrations of acetate, propionate, and n-butyrate, in the feces of higher performing sows.

Optimal gut microbiota in sows expose piglets to beneficial bacteria and establish, in them, optimal microbiota

Factors affecting gut microbiota development

Colostrum provides energy, immunity, and diverse bacteria and prebiotic compounds for gut development in neonates. In addition, optimal gut microbiota in sows expose piglets to beneficial bacteria and establish, in them, optimal microbiota. During the peripartum period, a sow’s gut microbiota composition, richness, and diversity alters. Potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria increase, whereas potentially beneficial butyrate producing bacteria such as Ruminococcus and Lachnospiraceae decrease. Gut permeability and the plasma endotoxin concentration improve.

Early microbial exposure

Piglet exposure to sow feed in lactation and environmental exposure influence the development of gut microbiota. Early microbial exposure has an integral role in gut microbiota development for piglets. Furthermore, maternal feces affects piglet microbial colonisation and improves piglet growth and survival. Moreover, cross-fostering alters piglet gut and cecal microbiota and improves growth performance.

Antibiotic administration

Early antibiotic administration for pathogen removal is non-selective and affects the commensal microbiota, reduces gut microbial diversity, increases antibiotic resistant bacteria, and leads to enteric dysbiosis. Maternal antibiotic administration has a negative effect on piglet gut morphology, with decreased crypt depth and altered gene expression profiles in the ileum.

Direct antibiotic administration decreases immunological communication. It also increases the expression of chemokine, and toll-like receptors. It decreases the abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Campylobacter and Pasteurella, and the abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria such as Prevotella and Butyrimonas.

Impact on production

Dietary additives such probiotics, prebiotics, and minerals are used to modulate the piglets’ gut microbiota. They also increase colonisation of beneficial bacteria, and improve health and the production outcome. Bacteria involved in higher performance include Lactobacillus, unclassified Prevotellaceae, and Ruminococcaceae.

Research shows that an increase in Ruminococcaceae in piglets is linked to improved growth during lactation. An increase in the abundances of Prevotella is associated with lower growth rates during lactation but a higher average daily gain after weaning. The increased abundance of Actinobacteria before weaning is a marker for increased post-weaning diarrhea, while increased abundance of Chlamydia and Helicobacter before weaning are markers for healthy and diarrhea-resistant pigs after weaning. A higher abundance of butyrate producing Christensenellaceae is linked with improved growth and reduced E. coli shedding.

Continuous microbial exposure

Gut microbial colonisation in early life is a major determinant of health and production performance. The establishment and development of the gut microbiota in piglets require continuous microbial exposure in neonates. However, the type and form of exposure that is not detrimental to the piglet in the post-weaning period must be considered.

加我们的微信#